| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SHW |
HW |
LHW |
MW |
WW |
LW |
FW |
BW |
FLY |
FEM |
|
| 267 & OVER |
207-266 |
193-206 |
177-192 |
163-176 |
150-162 |
140-149 |
130-139 |
129 & UNDER |
OPEN |
|
| |
|
|
|
3-YEAR PROFILES IN THIS DIVISION |
May
14, 2008 |
|
| Females |
VERSUS "STATS 200" FIGHTERS |
VERSUS "STATS 400" FIGHTERS |
VERSUS LOWER FIGHTERS |
COMMENTS |
|
| 1 |
|
TARA
LAROSA |
3-0 |
2-0 |
4-0 |
|
|
| 2 |
|
AMANDA
BUCKNER |
4-2 |
0-0 |
1-0 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
MEGUMI
FUJII |
2-0 |
3-0 |
6-0 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
YUKA
TSUJI |
2-0 |
2-0 |
4-0 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
MICHELLI
TAVARES |
2-1 |
1-0 |
2-0 |
|
|
| 6 |
|
GINA
CARANO |
2-0 |
0-0 |
3-0 |
|
|
| 7 |
|
TAKAYO
HASHI |
2-1 |
0-0 |
6-0 |
|
|
| 8 |
|
ROSI
SEXTON |
2-1 |
0-0 |
2-0 |
|
|
| 9 |
|
SEO HEE
HAM |
1-3 |
0-0 |
2-0 |
|
|
| 10 |
|
LISA WARD |
1-2 |
2-1 |
6-0 |
|
|
| 11 |
|
HITOMI
AKANO |
1-3 |
1-0 |
9-0 |
|
|
| 12 |
|
SARAH
KAUFMAN |
0-0 |
1-0 |
6-0 |
|
|
| 13 |
|
MIKU
MATSUMOTO |
2-2 |
3-1 |
9-0 |
|
|
| 14 |
|
CARINA
DAMM |
1-2 |
1-1 |
5-0 |
|
|
| 15 |
|
MISAKI
TAKIMOTO |
1-5 |
0-0-2 |
1-0-2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| HOW THE RANKS
WORK: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SUMMARY: This is NOT a
ranking of perceived talent, or who might beat who, or who is closest to
title contention in their organization.
This is an evaluation of which fighters have the best collection of
success against a chain of other successful fighters in the past 3
years. Only matches fought in this
division will affect a fighter's rank in this division. You move up the list by having a
successful record against opponents with successful records.. |
|
| STEP 1: Every fighter is
given a value for his wins, losses and draws in the last 3 years, where he
weighed within the range of this division.
The value for each result is based on the success rate of the
opponent, their opponents, their opponents, and so on down the line. Fighters remain connected until their
fight goes beyond the 3 year examination period. As a fighter becomes further-defined by fights, so too, do all
of his recent opponents. Step 1
establishes a list of active fighters with a collection of quality results. Depending on the depth of the division, it
usually takes at least 3 solid fight results to make what is known as the
"stats 400" list, an openweight list of fighters ranked under this
system. The complete list can be
found at |
|
| http://www.mmaranks.com/stats |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| STEP 2: Every fighter is
calculated in a similar manner as step 1, but this time, any wins against
fighters who are not on the "stats 400" list are worth zero. Step 2 puts the focus on quality wins,
while still factoring in losses. All
"stats 400" fighters will be ranked before fighters not in the top
400. |
|
| STEP
3: Panel members vote to modify the values attached to any fights that they
feel need intangible factors added to them.
Examples include indecisive or poor
judging, erroneus referee decisions, no contests, disaqualifications,
and other situations where the result doesn't tell the whole story. If you are interested in these
discussions, and becoming a panel member, you can sign in at |
|
| http://mmaranks.proboards105.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
HOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
