| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SHW |
HW |
LHW |
MW |
WW |
LW |
FW |
BW |
FLY |
FEM |
|
| 267 & OVER |
207-266 |
193-206 |
177-192 |
163-176 |
150-162 |
140-149 |
130-139 |
129 & UNDER |
OPEN |
|
| |
|
|
|
3-YEAR PROFILES IN THIS DIVISION |
June
22, 2008 |
|
| Heavyweights |
VERSUS "STATS 200" FIGHTERS |
VERSUS "STATS 400" FIGHTERS |
VERSUS LOWER FIGHTERS |
COMMENTS |
|
| 1 |
|
RODRIGO
NOGUEIRA |
3-1 |
2-0 |
2-0 |
|
|
| 2 |
|
FABRICIO
WERDUM |
2-3 |
3-0 |
1-0 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
MIRKO
FILIPOVIC |
4-2 |
0-1 |
4-1 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
JOSH
BARNETT |
3-3 |
0-0 |
4-0 |
upcoming: July 19 vs. Pedro Rizzo |
|
| 5 |
|
BEN
ROTHWELL |
0-1* |
2-0 |
9-1* |
panel agrees with the judges who charged him
with the loss in fights with Roy Nelson and Ricco Rodriguez |
|
| 6 |
|
TIM
SYLVIA |
3-1 |
1-0 |
2-1 |
upcoming: July 19 vs. Fedor Emelianenko |
|
| 7 |
|
TENGIZ
TEDORADZE |
2-0 |
0-3 |
7-0-1 |
|
|
| 8 |
|
CHIECK
KONGO |
1-0 |
2-2 |
3-0 |
|
|
| 9 |
|
FEDOR
EMELIANENKO |
1-0 |
0-0 |
5-0 |
upcoming: July 19 vs. Tim Sylvia |
|
| 10 |
|
ANDREI
ARLOVSKI |
1-2 |
3-0 |
1-0 |
|
|
| 11 |
|
ALEX
EMELIANENKO |
1-2 |
1-0 |
5-0 |
|
|
| 12 |
|
TRAVIS
WIUFF |
1-0 |
1-1 |
6-0 |
Panel votes to reduce the value of YAMMA's
1-round fights. |
|
| 13 |
|
ROY
NELSON |
1-0* |
1-0 |
7-1 |
panel agrees with the judge who awarded him the
win vs. Ben Rothwell |
|
| 14 |
|
EDDIE
SANCHEZ |
1-1 |
1-1 |
5-0 |
|
|
| 15 |
|
CHRIS
TUCHSCHERER |
0-1 |
2-0 |
8-0 |
Panel votes to reduce the value of YAMMA's
1-round fights. |
|
| 16 |
|
JEFF
MONSON |
0-2-1* |
1-0 |
7-1 |
panel currently scoring the match with Cruz as
even |
|
| 17 |
|
SERGEI
KHARITONOV |
1-1 |
2-1 |
2-0 |
|
|
| 18 |
|
TIM
HAGUE |
0-0 |
2-0 |
4-1 |
loss was a split decision |
|
| 19 |
|
BRETT
ROGERS |
0-0 |
0-0 |
7-0 |
|
|
| 20 |
|
MARCIO
CRUZ |
0-1-1* |
2-0 |
2-0 |
panel currently scoring the match with Monson
as even |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| HOW THE RANKS
WORK: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| This ranking measures a fighter's overall collection of
successes and failures in the past 36 months weighed against their opponents'
success rates in the last 36 months,
You move up the list by collecting wins against other recently
successful fighters and avoiding losses to fighters who don't have a
collection of recent success.
Everything is division-specific, so someone who has good credentials
in one division does not bring them to another division if they change
weights. |
|
| Every fighter is given a value for his wins, losses and draws in
the last 3 years, where he weighed within the range of this division. The value for each result is based on the
success rate of the opponent, their opponents, their opponents, and so on
down the line. Fighters remain
connected until their fight goes beyond the 3 year examination period. As a fighter becomes further-defined by
fights, so too, do all of his recent opponents. Depending on the depth of the division, it usually takes at
least 3 or 4 solid fight results to make it to the top 20 of a division. The complete list can be found at |
|
| http://www.mmaranks.com/stats |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| In
keeping with the thought that "numbers sometimes lie", panel
members vote to modify the values attached to any fights that they feel need
intangible factors added to them.
Examples include split judging, erroneus referee decisions, no
contests, disaqualifications, and other situations where the result may not
be a simple as "win/loss".
If you are interested in joining these discussions, and becoming a panel
member, you can sign in at |
|
| http://mmaranks.proboards105.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
HOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
