| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SHW |
HW |
LHW |
MW |
WW |
LW |
FW |
BW |
FLY |
FEM |
|
| 267 & OVER |
207-266 |
193-206 |
177-192 |
163-176 |
150-162 |
140-149 |
130-139 |
129 & UNDER |
OPEN |
|
| |
|
|
|
3-YEAR PROFILES IN THIS DIVISION |
September
8, 2008 |
|
| Lightweights |
VERSUS "STATS 200" FIGHTERS |
VERSUS "STATS 400" FIGHTERS |
VERSUS LOWER FIGHTERS |
COMMENTS |
|
| 1 |
|
FRANK
EDGAR |
5-0 |
1-1 |
3-0 |
|
|
| 2 |
|
SHINYA
AOKI |
4-1 |
0-0 |
4-0 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
HERMES
FRANCA |
3-1-1* |
2-0 |
3-1 |
panel currently agrees with the judge who ruled
the Boku match a draw Upcoming: Oct
25 vs. Marcus Aurelio |
|
| 4 |
|
GESIAS
CAVALCANTE |
2-1 |
2-0-1 |
4-0 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
KENNY
FLORIAN |
4-0 |
1-0 |
1-1 |
|
|
| 6 |
|
CAOL UNO |
2-3 |
0-1 |
6-0 |
|
|
| 7 |
|
TAKANORI
GOMI |
2-0 |
3-1 |
3-0 |
|
|
| 8 |
|
MIZUTO
HIROTA |
2-2 |
1-0 |
5-0 |
|
|
| 9 |
|
SPENCER
FISHER |
2-2* |
1-0 |
3-0 |
panel agrees with the judge who awarded him the
win in his first match with Stout.
Upcoming: Oct 25 vs. Melvin Guillard |
|
| 10 |
|
ROGER
HUERTA |
1-1 |
2-0 |
8-0 |
upcoming: Aug 9 vs. Kenny Florian |
|
| 11 |
|
VITOR
RIBEIRO |
0-1 |
1-0 |
7-0 |
|
|
| 12 |
|
TATSUYA
KAWAJIRI |
0-2* |
0-1 |
7-0 |
panel decides not to count the DQ win over
Joachim Hansen |
|
| 13 |
|
JOACHIM
HANSEN |
2-2* |
0-3 |
4-0 |
panel decides not to count the DQ loss to Tatsuya
Kawajiri. Panel currently agrees with
the judges who said he lost vs Edwards.
Click here to add your opinion |
|
| 14 |
|
GILBERT
MELENDEZ |
2-2 |
0-0 |
4-0 |
|
|
| 15 |
|
GANJO
TENTSUKU |
1-1-1 |
2-0 |
3-1 |
|
|
| 16 |
|
BART
PALASZEWSKI |
0-5 |
2-0 |
13-0 |
|
|
| 17 |
|
SAM
STOUT |
1-3* |
0-0 |
5-0 |
panel agrees with the judge who charged him
with the loss in his first match with Fisher and the win in his match with
Clementi. Upcoming: Oct 18 vs. Terry Etim |
|
| 18 |
|
JOSH
THOMSON |
1-1 |
1-0 |
5-0 |
|
|
| 19 |
|
MITSUHIRO
ISHIDA |
1-2 |
1-0 |
5-0 |
|
|
| 20 |
|
CLAY
GUIDA |
1-3 |
1-3 |
7-0 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| HOW THE RANKS
WORK: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| This ranking measures a fighter's overall collection of
successes and failures in the past 36 months weighed against their opponents'
success rates in the last 36 months,
You move up the list by collecting wins against other recently
successful fighters and avoiding losses to fighters who don't have a
collection of recent success.
Everything is division-specific, so someone who has good credentials
in one division does not bring them to another division if they change
weights. |
|
| Every fighter is given a value for his wins, losses and draws in
the last 3 years, where he weighed within the range of this division. The value for each result is based on the
success rate of the opponent, their opponents, their opponents, and so on
down the line. Fighters remain
connected until their fight goes beyond the 3 year examination period. As a fighter becomes further-defined by
fights, so too, do all of his recent opponents. Depending on the depth of the division, it usually takes at
least 3 or 4 solid fight results to make it to the top 20 of a division. The complete list can be found at |
|
| http://www.mmaranks.com/stats |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| In
keeping with the thought that "numbers sometimes lie", panel
members vote to modify the values attached to any fights that they feel need
intangible factors added to them.
Examples include split judging, erroneus referee decisions, no
contests, disaqualifications, and other situations where the result may not
be a simple as "win/loss".
If you are interested in joining these discussions, and becoming a panel
member, you can sign in at |
|
| http://mmaranks.proboards105.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
HOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
