| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SHW |
HW |
LHW |
MW |
WW |
LW |
FW |
BW |
FLY |
FEM |
|
| 267 & OVER |
207-266 |
193-206 |
177-192 |
163-176 |
150-162 |
140-149 |
130-139 |
129 & UNDER |
OPEN |
|
| |
|
|
|
3-YEAR PROFILES IN THIS DIVISION |
June
23, 2008 |
|
| Lightweights |
VERSUS "STATS 200" FIGHTERS |
VERSUS "STATS 400" FIGHTERS |
VERSUS LOWER FIGHTERS |
COMMENTS |
|
| 1 |
|
GESIAS
CAVALCANTE |
2-1 |
2-0-1 |
4-0 |
|
|
| 2 |
|
SHINYA
AOKI |
3-0 |
0-0 |
4-0 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
HERMES
FRANCA |
2-0 |
1-0-1* |
5-1 |
panel currently agrees with the judge who ruled
the Boku match a draw |
|
| 4 |
|
ROGER
HUERTA |
1-0 |
2-0 |
8-0 |
upcoming: Aug 9 vs. Kenny Florian |
|
| 5 |
|
MITSUHIRO
ISHIDA |
3-2 |
0-0 |
6-0 |
|
|
| 6 |
|
CAOL UNO |
2-2 |
0-1 |
6-0 |
|
|
| 7 |
|
FRANK
EDGAR |
4-0 |
1-1 |
3-0 |
|
|
| 8 |
|
TAKANORI
GOMI |
3-1 |
1-0 |
4-0 |
|
|
| 9 |
|
JOACHIM
HANSEN |
1-1* |
2-1 |
4-2 |
panel decides not to count the DQ loss to
Tatsuya Kawajiri |
|
| 10 |
|
SPENCER
FISHER |
2-2* |
1-0 |
3-0 |
panel agrees with the judge who awarded him the
win in his first match with Stout. |
|
| 11 |
|
TATSUYA
KAWAJIRI |
0-2* |
0-0 |
7-0 |
panel decides not to count the DQ win over
Joachim Hansen |
|
| 12 |
|
SAM
STOUT |
1-3* |
1-0 |
5-0 |
panel agrees with the judge who charged him
with the loss in his first match with Spencer Fisher and the win in his match
with Rich Clementi. |
|
| 13 |
|
CLAY
GUIDA |
2-3 |
1-3 |
7-0 |
|
|
| 14 |
|
VITOR
RIBEIRO |
0-1 |
1-0 |
7-0 |
|
|
| 15 |
|
BART
PALASZEWSKI |
0-5 |
2-0 |
13-0 |
|
|
| 16 |
|
MIZUTO
HIROTA |
1-1 |
1-1 |
6-0 |
|
|
| 17 |
|
GILBERT
MELENDEZ |
2-1 |
1-0 |
3-0 |
upcoming: June 27 vs. Josh Thomson |
|
| 18 |
|
GANJO
TENTSUKU |
1-1-1 |
2-0 |
3-1 |
|
|
| 19 |
|
KENNY
FLORIAN |
2-0 |
2-0 |
1-1 |
upcoming: Aug 9 vs. Roger Huerta |
|
| 20 |
|
JOSH
THOMSON |
0-1 |
2-0 |
5-0 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| HOW THE RANKS
WORK: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| This ranking measures a fighter's overall collection of
successes and failures in the past 36 months weighed against their opponents'
success rates in the last 36 months,
You move up the list by collecting wins against other recently
successful fighters and avoiding losses to fighters who don't have a
collection of recent success.
Everything is division-specific, so someone who has good credentials
in one division does not bring them to another division if they change
weights. |
|
| Every fighter is given a value for his wins, losses and draws in
the last 3 years, where he weighed within the range of this division. The value for each result is based on the
success rate of the opponent, their opponents, their opponents, and so on
down the line. Fighters remain
connected until their fight goes beyond the 3 year examination period. As a fighter becomes further-defined by
fights, so too, do all of his recent opponents. Depending on the depth of the division, it usually takes at
least 3 or 4 solid fight results to make it to the top 20 of a division. The complete list can be found at |
|
| http://www.mmaranks.com/stats |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| In
keeping with the thought that "numbers sometimes lie", panel
members vote to modify the values attached to any fights that they feel need
intangible factors added to them.
Examples include split judging, erroneus referee decisions, no
contests, disaqualifications, and other situations where the result may not
be a simple as "win/loss".
If you are interested in joining these discussions, and becoming a panel
member, you can sign in at |
|
| http://mmaranks.proboards105.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
HOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
