| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SHW |
HW |
LHW |
MW |
WW |
LW |
FW |
BW |
FLY |
FEM |
|
| 267 & OVER |
207-266 |
193-206 |
177-192 |
163-176 |
150-162 |
140-149 |
130-139 |
129 & UNDER |
OPEN |
|
| |
|
|
|
3-YEAR PROFILES IN THIS DIVISION |
May
10, 2008 |
|
| Welterweights |
VERSUS "STATS 200" FIGHTERS |
VERSUS "STATS 400" FIGHTERS |
VERSUS LOWER FIGHTERS |
COMMENTS |
|
| 1 |
|
JON
FITCH |
5-0 |
1-0 |
2-1* |
Our panel charges Fitch with the loss in his
match with Jeff Joslin. |
|
| 2 |
|
DAVID
BARON |
2-0 |
2-0 |
1-0 |
|
|
| 3 |
|
JOSH
KOSCHEK |
3-2 |
0-0 |
5-0 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
KARO
PARISYAN |
3-2 |
0-0 |
2-0 |
|
|
| 5 |
|
CHRIS
WILSON |
3-2 |
0-1 |
6-0 |
upcoming: July 5 vs. Steve Bruno |
|
| 6 |
|
JAY
HIERON |
4-2 |
0-1 |
6-0 |
|
|
| 7 |
|
DREW
FICKETT |
2-2 |
1-0 |
6-0 |
|
|
| 8 |
|
SATORU
KITAOKA |
2-1 |
1-1-1 |
3-0 |
upcoming: May 18 vs. Ian Schaffa |
|
| 9 |
|
JOSH
BURKMAN |
1-2 |
3-0 |
1-1 |
Unranked loss was a majority decision loss to
Mike Swick. |
|
| 10 |
|
DIEGO
SANCHEZ |
1-2 |
1-0 |
5-0 |
|
|
| 11 |
|
RORY
MARKHAM |
2-3* |
1-0 |
2-0 |
Panel charges Markham with the loss in the
Wisniewski fight. |
|
| 12 |
|
KEITH
WISNIEWSKI |
1-1* |
1-2* |
2-0 |
Panel awards Wisniewski the win in THE Rory
Markham match. Panel awards
Wisniewski the win in the Jorge Masvidal match. |
|
| 13 |
|
NICK
THOMPSON |
3-1 |
3-0 |
6-1* |
Panel charges Thompson with the loss in his fight with
Fabricio Monteiro. Click here
for 20 questions with Nick Thompson. |
|
| 14 |
|
GARY
WRIGHT |
1-0 |
2-0 |
4-0 |
|
|
| 15 |
|
HAYATO
SAKURAI |
2-1 |
0-0 |
2-0 |
|
|
| 16 |
|
JONATHAN
GOULET |
2-2 |
1-1 |
5-0 |
|
|
| 17 |
|
DUANE
LUDWIG |
1-1 |
0-0 |
3-0 |
|
|
| 18 |
|
EDDIE
ALVAREZ |
1-1 |
1-0 |
5-0 |
|
|
| 19 |
|
CARLOS
CONDIT |
1-3 |
2-0 |
6-0 |
|
|
| 20 |
|
THIAGO
ALVES |
2-1 |
2-0 |
3-1 |
upsoming: June 7 vs. Matt Hughes |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| HOW THE RANKS
WORK: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SUMMARY: This is NOT a
ranking of perceived talent, or who might beat who, or who is closest to
title contention in their organization.
This is an evaluation of which fighters have the best collection of
success against a chain of other successful fighters in the past 3
years. Only matches fought in this
division will affect a fighter's rank in this division. You move up the list by having a
successful record against opponents with successful records.. |
|
| STEP 1: Every fighter is
given a value for his wins, losses and draws in the last 3 years, where he
weighed within the range of this division.
The value for each result is based on the success rate of the
opponent, their opponents, their opponents, and so on down the line. Fighters remain connected until their
fight goes beyond the 3 year examination period. As a fighter becomes further-defined by fights, so too, do all
of his recent opponents. Step 1
establishes a list of active fighters with a collection of quality results. Depending on the depth of the division, it
usually takes at least 3 solid fight results to make what is known as the
"stats 400" list, an openweight list of fighters ranked under this
system. The complete list can be
found at |
|
| http://www.mmaranks.com/stats |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| STEP 2: Every fighter is
calculated in a similar manner as step 1, but this time, any wins against
fighters who are not on the "stats 400" list are worth zero. Step 2 puts the focus on quality wins,
while still factoring in losses. All
"stats 400" fighters will be ranked before fighters not in the top
400. |
|
| STEP
3: Panel members vote to modify the values attached to any fights that they
feel need intangible factors added to them.
Examples include indecisive or poor
judging, erroneus referee decisions, no contests, disaqualifications,
and other situations where the result doesn't tell the whole story. If you are interested in these
discussions, and becoming a panel member, you can sign in at |
|
| http://mmaranks.proboards105.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
HOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
